On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub wrote: >> > Now, here are my actual questions: >> > >> > 1. What should the "relative" names of the branches be? "stable" vs >> > "latest" etc. I especially don't like "integration", but I do see a >> > time where it is not ready for "stable" but still needs to branch off >> > of "latest". >> >> reallyold >> old >> current >> next >> latest/experimental > > I think we can limit the relative branches to: > > master = integration, unstable, tip, bleeding edge (same as now) > [next] = next upcoming release (same as now) However, now a release means a dev cycle, which is different than having a few iterations on a single release. So should 'next' be the next release, or the next output of the current dev cycle? > current = most recent release > stable = most recent stable release > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
