Re: Filesystems for ceph

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Christian Brunner wrote:
> We are having quite some problems with the underlying filesystem for
> the cosd's and I would like to hear about other experiences. Here is
> what we have gone through so far:
> 
> btrfs with 2.6.38:
> 
> - good performance
> - frequently hitting of various BUG_ON conditions
> 
> btrfs with 2.6.39:
> 
> - big performance problems after a few days uptime
> - occasionally hitting BUG_ON conditions
> 
> btrfs with 3.0:
> 
> - big performance problems after a few days uptime
> - occasionally hitting a deadlock in the btrfs filesystem (cosd is in D-state)

You might try 3.0 + the latest stuff Chris just sent to Linus (at least 
for the D-state problem).  I'm eager to see whether the latencytop info 
you sent is helpful for the rest.

FWIW we're running 2.6.38+ at the moment.  We get some warnings with the 
orphan code (fixed in .39), but it's otherwise been reasonably stable.  

sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux