On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Fyodor Ustinov wrote: > On 07/28/2011 02:33 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Fyodor Ustinov wrote: > > > Christian Brunner<chb<at> muc.de> writes: > > > > > > > From what I read in Fyodors emails ext4 in 2.6.39 isn't much better. > > > > > > > > So, what filesystem would you recommend? > > > > > > > Christian, IMHO ext3/ext4/btrfs unusable for ceph. I tested some time xfs, > > > and > > > think to use it again. But I think that the ceph developers do not like > > > xfs:) > > What problems have you seen with ext4? > > Look to my message to Greg. In a nutshell - I again have broken ext4 fs > on OSD servers with 2.6.39 kernel. Oh, you mean the fsck errors? Got it. If you see it again (on another disk/machine, with a reasonably fresh fs) the ext4 guys will be interested in hearing about it. It's probably in the xattr code, which ceph uses heavily but most people only set once per file (for selinux labels), if at all. sage -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
