Re: RPM issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:32:20AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> > The more annoying dependencies are things like GTK2, which don't
> > really affect the behavior of the rest of the project, but which will
> > have to be "mandatory" in the RPM, it seems.
> 
> We should really break that into a separate package at some point.  The 
> main roadblock there iirc is breaking it into a separate binary.  
> Originally I thought we should have it launched via the ceph tool (similar 
> to the git subcommands) but at this point I don't really care either way.

Well, if you follow the git model, the subcommands are executables in
a specific directory; other source packages could install their
binaries there too.

And to avoid even protocol incompatibilities, gceph, or "ceph gui",
could actually run a git plumbing-style tool underneath, and just
consume it's stdout. Or just build against libceph-dev, that'll work
too.

-- 
:(){ :|:&};:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux