Hi Colin, On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 13:06 -0800, Colin McCabe wrote: > Yeah, after some discussion, I think we're sticking with gceph. Sorry > for the email spam :) Don't worry, I'm always open for discussions. Only please don't make me believe I changed your mind about any change in ceph development or I'll apply for a job there and ask for some money in return. :) > Let me know if you have any issues w/ packaging... I've a question. gceph needs everything noted in debian/ceph.install (cephfs, cconf, ... the rados classes and manpages), right? The best would be to make a ceph-common package, depending on ceph | gceph and the latter packages would contain only the binaries ceph and gceph respectively. Am I right? Laszlo/GCS -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
