On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Laszlo Boszormenyi <gcs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 12:37 -0800, Sage Weil wrote: >> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: >> > It's up to you how to name it. As for the rule of thumb, packages named >> > after the binary they contain. So it should be gceph, but can be >> > ceph-gui if you want. >> >> I'm inclined to rename gceph to ceph-gui, actually, unless anyone has any >> strong opinions about it... > Either is fine for me, should be gceph after the binary but I admit > that ceph-gui is more suitable for its name. Still if I've a voting > right, I'd say ceph-gui suggests it's only a GUI for the CLI binary > (needs ceph, just calls ceph with it's switches in the background). It's > not the case, it's a standalone binary, a graphical ceph -> gceph. Of > course the choice is yours. Yeah, after some discussion, I think we're sticking with gceph. Sorry for the email spam :) Let me know if you have any issues w/ packaging... Colin > >> > The question is, when do you want to merge these changes to rc? There >> > are unstable and gceph trees available, but are they for v0.24 or not? >> >> The binary is standalone. They should just recommend each other, I think. >> And this is all in the unstable branch (for v0.25), so we can just change >> it there. > OK, will do tomorrow if you decide on how to name its package. > > Offtopic: What's your timezone? I'm UTC/GMT +1. > > Laszlo/GCS > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
