On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Thomas Mueller wrote: > Am Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:02:19 -0700 schrieb Sage Weil: > > > BTW, the Debian kernel guys would rather include the ceph module in the > > main kernel package than include a dkms package directly in Debian. > > That means maintaining a backport branch specifically for 2.6.32 (the > > squeeze kernel). > > > > (We should still have this dkms package available on the ceph site, of > > course!) > > would be cool if they included it in squeeze kernel. but i'm bit > surprised. squeeze freeze is expected late august (http:// > lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/06/msg00002.html) and debian > folks normaly don't bump versions and only do bugfixing after a release. > > so I would expect that squeeze has to include a stable ceph.ko and stable > server side too. And as the freeze seems to be approaching fast this > would be a tough schedule. I'm not sure what their criteria are there... the ceph-dkms ITP is 589562, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589562 > what leads me to my other question: when will ceph be considered > "stable"? :) Soon? :) I'd be interested in hearing what you (or anyone else) expect from a "stable" v1.0 release. See http://tracker.newdream.net/projects/ceph/roadmap. sage -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
