Re: NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 1/28/2010 5:23 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
> So, is there any benefit in using NFS over SMB in this case? The CIFS
> mounts can't be unmounted without a reboot, so they build-up a pool of
> mounts to the same server which cause extra latency

I don't understand either of not being able to unmount a cifs mount or 
not being able to avoid remounting when it is already mounted.  That's 
probably something you can fix.  The only thing that should keep you 
from unmounting would be if some file is open or a running process has 
its working directory under the mount point.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux