Re: Bind data directory borked on update from 5.3 to 5.4

[Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey@xxxxxxx>]

Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Kai Schaetzl wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:00:48 +0100:
>
>   
>> I wonder now if the owner of 
>> that directory should actually be named?
>>     
>
> Hm, after looking on other machines that have named installed but not in 
> use it's excactly the same there. So, if named wants write permission 
> there, but the rpm always removes that permission - isn't the rpm wrong 
> then? Should I report this as a bug?
>   

On my system, named does not have write permission to the named
directory, but it does have permission to named/data.

        # ll /var/named/chroot/var/
        total 24
        drwxr-x---  4 root  named 4096 Aug 25  2004 named
        drwxrwx---  3 root  named 4096 Mar 13  2003 run
        drwxrwx---  2 named named 4096 Mar 13  2003 tmp

        # ll /var/named/chroot/var/named/
        total 16
        drwxrwx---  5 named named 4096 Sep 25 14:25 data
        drwxrwx---  2 named named 4096 Jul 27  2004 slaves

Everything is working fine for me with these settings, so I don't think
this is a problem.

-- 
Bowie
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos