Re: Bind data directory borked on update from 5.3 to 5.4

[Kai Schaetzl <maillists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Kai Schaetzl wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:00:48 +0100:

> I wonder now if the owner of 
> that directory should actually be named?

Hm, after looking on other machines that have named installed but not in 
use it's excactly the same there. So, if named wants write permission 
there, but the rpm always removes that permission - isn't the rpm wrong 
then? Should I report this as a bug?

Kai

-- 
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos