Re: Bind data directory borked on update from 5.3 to 5.4

[Kai Schaetzl <maillists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Kai Schaetzl wrote on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:31:33 +0100:

> No. I usually see some change in the permissions 
> (/var/named/chroot/var/named/ loses group write and named logs some 
> complaints but still works) when updating named.

And sure enought that happened with latest bind update today again.

/var/named/chroot/var l
drwxrwx--- 2 named named 4096 Jan 20 17:33 log
drwxr-x--- 4 root  named 4096 Jan 20 17:33 named
drwxr-x--- 4 root  named 4096 Mar 14  2003 run
drwxrwx--- 2 named named 4096 Mar 14  2003 tmp

I usually set g+w for the named directory. I wonder now if the owner of 
that directory should actually be named? Thanks.

Kai

-- 
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos