> Hard to believe, but certain very well known organizations refuse to get off
> NIS for critical and secure systems.
{{citation needed}}
:-)
--
Drew
"Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood."
--Marie Curie
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: NIS failover
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: NIS failover
- From: Drew <drew.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:41:20 -0800
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <d3d177bd0912180026q292fe047k1ddc9a69261d3d21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <EA799A77ABAA4D7797136133F8E5EFD8@phoenix> <44839.165.112.92.128.1261079094.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091217195015.GC9854@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <d3d177bd0912180026q292fe047k1ddc9a69261d3d21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- NIS failover
- From: Jason Pyeron
- Re: NIS failover
- From: m . roth
- Re: NIS failover
- From: John R. Dennison
- Re: NIS failover
- From: Peter Serwe
- NIS failover
- Prev by Date: Re: mountd and statd at specific ports - nfs firewall
- Next by Date: Re: yum quit working in CentOS 5.4 x86_64 [SOLVED]
- Previous by thread: Re: NIS failover
- Next by thread: Re: NIS failover
- Index(es):
 |