On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Peter Serwe wrote: > After dealing with a couple of issues with OpenLDAP, I'd say it beats the > piss out of NIS all day long. NIS is ancient and decrepit. Agreed. > Hard to believe, but certain very well known organizations refuse to get off > NIS for critical and secure systems. Astonishing. -s _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: NIS failover
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: NIS failover
- From: Steve Thompson <smt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:10:49 -0500 (EST)
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <d3d177bd0912180026q292fe047k1ddc9a69261d3d21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <EA799A77ABAA4D7797136133F8E5EFD8@phoenix> <44839.165.112.92.128.1261079094.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091217195015.GC9854@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <d3d177bd0912180026q292fe047k1ddc9a69261d3d21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- NIS failover
- From: Jason Pyeron
- Re: NIS failover
- From: m . roth
- Re: NIS failover
- From: John R. Dennison
- Re: NIS failover
- From: Peter Serwe
- NIS failover
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Urgent request
- Next by Date: Re: latest kernel (-164.9.1) not seen by yum
- Previous by thread: Re: NIS failover
- Next by thread: Re: NIS failover
- Index(es):
 |