On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:44:54PM -0700, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Not one you want to hear: ditch NIS. It's known to have a *lot* of > security holes. At the very least, NIS+. Better would be either RH Out of curiousity, can you point me to writeups of known working exploits against current yp-family versions on CentOS? NIS+ is not, the last time I checked, available for Linux; if my understanding is in error I would very much welcome correction. John -- We cannot do everything at once, but we can do something at once. -- Calvin Coolidge (1872-1933), 30th president of the United States
Attachment:
pgpNPO9Sr1FuG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
