Re: 5.3 and XFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 07:34:13AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >> I never thought of that given that they come from the plus repo. So its only
....
> >
> > iirc, the xfs kmod's are not kernel ver dependant anymore, and havent
> > been for a while.
> >
> > Tru / Akemi ?
> 
> The kABI-tracking kmod-xfs for CentOS-5 started in Oct 2008.  The
> CentOS-4 version has been tested and will be offered shortly (as soon
> as you/Tru builds it for release).  :-D
> 
> But the code is somewhat getting old.  Maybe it's time to get the
> project xfs going again?  Tru is the leader of this project.

OLD?  What is broken that needs fixing?

XFS is in rather good shape and should not require much activity.
As technology goes it was cutting edge technology when SGI designed it.
It may be that ext4 will catch up but based on the clock the new ext4
may not be as stable as XFS is.  A year from now... who knows.

I do see xfs related patches going to Linus today ... so it is not idle.





-- 
	T o m  M i t c h e l l 
	Found me a new hat, now what?

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux