On 04/15/2009 08:58 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > Looking at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469401 > has me a bit unsure about the kmod for 5.3's kernel, is not expected > to appear? xfs kmod's for centos-5 have so far been done within the centos loop, but this is interesting - looks like 5.4 might have a tech-preview for xfs included in. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: 5.3 and XFS
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: 5.3 and XFS
- From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:15:53 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE0DB6A6E6223@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE0DB6A6E6223@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 5.3 and XFS
- From: Geoff Galitz
- Re: 5.3 and XFS
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- Re: 5.3 and XFS
- References:
- 5.3 and XFS
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- 5.3 and XFS
- Prev by Date: Re: 5.3 and XFS
- Next by Date: Re: re-install package
- Previous by thread: 5.3 and XFS
- Next by thread: Re: 5.3 and XFS
- Index(es):
 |