Joseph L. Casale wrote: > I never thought of that given that they come from the plus repo. So its only > a matter of time then before it appears for the 5.3 kernels... If I have time this > weekend, I'll yank an srpm down from the 5.2 branch kmod and see what's > involved in making this (Never done it, so I have no idea off the top of my head). > iirc, the xfs kmod's are not kernel ver dependant anymore, and havent been for a while. Tru / Akemi ? - KB _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: 5.3 and XFS
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: 5.3 and XFS
- From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:21:34 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE0DB6A6E622B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE0DB6A6E6223@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <49E678B9.3090902@xxxxxxxxx> <49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE0DB6A6E622B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081120)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 5.3 and XFS
- From: Akemi Yagi
- Re: 5.3 and XFS
- References:
- 5.3 and XFS
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- Re: 5.3 and XFS
- From: Karanbir Singh
- Re: 5.3 and XFS
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- 5.3 and XFS
- Prev by Date: Re: Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed
- Next by Date: Re: Dual-boot with WinXP, CentOS already installed
- Previous by thread: Re: 5.3 and XFS
- Next by thread: Re: 5.3 and XFS
- Index(es):
 |