Dag Wieers wrote:
> We did not do anything. It is a bug in the priorities
> plugin.
>
> The reason we have a perl-DBD-mysql is because that is the
> upstream name and the naming convention dictates to use the
> upstream name. That is the only reliable way for not having
> RPM clashes.
>
> Maybe someone should report to Red Hat that perl-DBD-MySQL
> has a packaging bug ?
>
> http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBD-mysql/
>
What is the bug? It does not appear in the site you linked to.
It would be surprising if Red Hat are unaware of upstream changes
as one would expect it to be rolled out into Fedora rawhide at least
even if the changes are backported int RHEL.
Regards,
Vandaman.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
