>No port or packet types are needed as everything needs to be MASQed. Sorry, I wasn't clear. I only want ports 80/443 translated for internal clients so I do need a rule of some sorts. Thanks! jlc _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: Iptables masq traffic limiting
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "'CentOS mailing list'" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Iptables masq traffic limiting
- From: "Joseph L. Casale" <JCasale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:38:47 -0600
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <200808291823.30804.mlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE0D37050E8C4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200808291740.38627.mlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE0D37050E8C5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200808291823.30804.mlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Thread-index: AckKJe/VpPjon43mS86a8IsZ/udGPwAAe7Zw
- Thread-topic: Iptables masq traffic limiting
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Iptables masq traffic limiting
- From: Robert Spangler
- Re: Iptables masq traffic limiting
- References:
- Iptables masq traffic limiting
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- Re: Iptables masq traffic limiting
- From: Robert Spangler
- RE: Iptables masq traffic limiting
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- Re: Iptables masq traffic limiting
- From: Robert Spangler
- Iptables masq traffic limiting
- Prev by Date: Re: Iptables masq traffic limiting
- Next by Date: Re: Webalizer displays wrong year
- Previous by thread: Re: Iptables masq traffic limiting
- Next by thread: Re: Iptables masq traffic limiting
- Index(es):
 |