Re: Iptables masq traffic limiting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Friday 29 August 2008 17:26, Joseph L. Casale wrote:

>  Where is the correct place to control what traffic is masq'ed out?
>  This is what I have, but I was told the Forward chain isn't the right
> place to do this?
>
>  iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -o $WAN -j MASQUERADE
>  iptables -A FORWARD -i $WAN -o $LAN -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
> -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -i $LAN -o $WAN -m state --state
> NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -p tcp -m multiport --dports 80,443 -j ACCEPT
>
>  So which table is the theoretically correct place to add all the
> ports/services I would want masq'ed out for internal clients?

Postrouting is the correct one.  After everything is routed it is MASQ before 
leaving the interface.


-- 

Regards
Robert

Smile... it increases your face value!
Linux User #296285
http://counter.li.org
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux