On Friday 29 August 2008 18:38, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >No port or packet types are needed as everything needs to be MASQed. > > Sorry, I wasn't clear. I only want ports 80/443 translated for internal > clients so I do need a rule of some sorts. We should be talking live. Why don't your join the #centos-social on freenode so we can chat real time? -- Regards Robert It is not just an adventure. It is my job!! Linux User #296285 http://counter.li.org _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Iptables masq traffic limiting
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Iptables masq traffic limiting
- From: Robert Spangler <mlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:41:15 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE0D37050E8C6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE0D37050E8C4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200808291823.30804.mlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE0D37050E8C6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: KMail/1.7.1
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Iptables masq traffic limiting
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- RE: Iptables masq traffic limiting
- References:
- Iptables masq traffic limiting
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- Re: Iptables masq traffic limiting
- From: Robert Spangler
- RE: Iptables masq traffic limiting
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- Iptables masq traffic limiting
- Prev by Date: Re: Webalizer displays wrong year
- Next by Date: RE: Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing DualLayer DVD)
- Previous by thread: RE: Iptables masq traffic limiting
- Next by thread: RE: Iptables masq traffic limiting
- Index(es):
 |