Re: Problem accessing to Windows Terminal Server in load balancing.

["ArcosCom Linux User" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

2 questions:
   a) Must I put the same IP with 3 "virtual macs" under the same interface?
   b) Must the ARP entry be changed in the bridges? In the computers?

Regards

El Mie, 28 de Mayo de 2008, 18:12, Lorenzo Quatrini escribió:
> ArcosCom Linux User ha scritto:
>
>>
>> I observed that all TSn IP's has their ARP entry in the ARP table, but
>> the
>> IP for load balancing not.
>>
>> How can I solve this problem at the bridge level? I think that there is
>> something that the bridges are filtering and perhaps is because the TS
>> load balancing software uses various "virtual macs" for the load
>> balancing
>> IP.
>>
>
> I had a similar issue with a Cisco router; the solution was to add an
> entry on
> the arp table for the IP for load balancing and the "virtual" ethernet
> address
> of the cluster. (You can find them on the properties of the cluster)
>
> I guess you could use /etc/ether to make the mapping persistent.
>
> Regards
>
> Lorenzo Quatrini
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos