ArcosCom Linux User ha scritto:
I observed that all TSn IP's has their ARP entry in the ARP table, but the IP for load balancing not. How can I solve this problem at the bridge level? I think that there is something that the bridges are filtering and perhaps is because the TS load balancing software uses various "virtual macs" for the load balancing IP.
I had a similar issue with a Cisco router; the solution was to add an entry on the arp table for the IP for load balancing and the "virtual" ethernet address of the cluster. (You can find them on the properties of the cluster)
I guess you could use /etc/ether to make the mapping persistent. Regards Lorenzo Quatrini _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
