Johnny Hughes wrote:
copyright law?
Well ... the general consensus is that is not the case, and that the
SPEC file is covered under the same license as the rest of the source
code unless it is specifically licensed differently.
So, distributing the RPMS (the GPL ones) would probably be OK.
Using them is also OK, so long as you PAY Red Hat on every machine where
you use things that cam from RHN.
By why is adding a restriction to enforce that OK, unless it only
applies to the non-GPL'd portions?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
