Les Mikesell wrote:
It is not a restriction, it is a agreement ... if you want to download the file from them, you agree to pay for it every place you use it.Johnny Hughes wrote:copyright law?Well ... the general consensus is that is not the case, and that the SPEC file is covered under the same license as the rest of the source code unless it is specifically licensed differently.So, distributing the RPMS (the GPL ones) would probably be OK.Using them is also OK, so long as you PAY Red Hat on every machine where you use things that cam from RHN.By why is adding a restriction to enforce that OK, unless it only applies to the non-GPL'd portions?
If you don't want to do that, then you need to get your linux from some place else.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
