On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 08:57 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 13:46 +0100, Daniel de Kok wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams > > <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I'm not talking about the spec file metadata, I'm talking about the > > > signature that's applied to the package itself. > > > > A signature is just a special digest of the contents. I don't see how > > that could be licensed differently. > > And a painting of a landscape is just a special digest (or > interpretation, if you prefer) of a landscape. It falls under copyright > law, regardless of what laws the canvas or paint are required to follow. Before anyone tears this apart *too* hard, I would like to apologize for misrepresenting myself. I am not a lawyer, therefore I should have said that this was only my opinion. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
