Re: Re: are RPMForge and EPEL compatible?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Stephen John Smoogen wrote:

I would say that the only thing that needs to top this off is some
rumours that the other side is going to use bitkeeper for its source
control, or ESR saying they thought that ZYZ was now his preferred
repo and RMS saying that the other was the only true repository.

...or why Linux can't include zfs because it can't be restricted enough to call it free.

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux