RE: SATA vs. SAS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Peter Arremann wrote:
> 
> On the other hand, data reliability is another issue. We have tons of
> sata based disk arrays and have had no issues yet (because our systems
> are all on UPS and multiple circuits) but if you don't have
> infrastructure like that, you are more likely to lose data on a sata
> based system... 

Why do you say that SATA arrays are less reliable?  I have used both
SATA and SCSI raid and have had drive failures on both.  Recovery from
the failures seems to be more a matter of the raid implementation than
the interface type.

-- 
Bowie
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux