Re: SATA vs. SAS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wednesday 22 August 2007, Rajeev R Veedu wrote:
...
> Option 1) 2 servers each having 2.0TB raid disk with SAS drives, 2GB ram
> and standard other features.
>
> Option 2) 4 No servers with 1TB each with 2GB ram and standard other
> features.

Late comment on this thread. Really short comment actually:

 SAS vs. SATA is not the issue, raid controller A vs. B is.

/Peter

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux