Bowie Bailey wrote: > <snip> > Recovery from > the failures seems to be more a matter of the raid implementation than > the interface type. > My 'day job' is with a data recovery firm. I cannot agree more fervently with Bowie's comment above. ~Ray _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: SATA vs. SAS
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: SATA vs. SAS
- From: Ray Leventhal <centos@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:09:51 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4766EEE585A6D311ADF500E018C154E3026857B5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <4766EEE585A6D311ADF500E018C154E3026857B5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
- References:
- RE: SATA vs. SAS
- From: Bowie Bailey
- RE: SATA vs. SAS
- Prev by Date: Re: Trying to understand Remote desktops
- Next by Date: Re: 8 port serial card
- Previous by thread: RE: SATA vs. SAS
- Next by thread: Re: SATA vs. SAS
- Index(es):
 |