On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 07:18:55PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:09:06PM -0400, Joe Klemmer wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > > >Personally I would recommend fixing the above, as the dovecot version > > >as shipped by the upstream vendor (0.99.11 from 2004) is not > > >maintained by the author anymore. See > > > > > > http://wiki.dovecot.org/UpgradingDovecot > > > Maybe dropping back to 1.0.0-8_56.el4.at might be worth a test. I may try > > that later today. > > Was that the previous version? If so then the breakage is serious, as > 1.0.1 is considered a stable bugfix release over 1.0.0. Please feed me > (or directly the dovecot list) with any information you can gather. > > (Until now I though you were running 0.99.x previously) I found a bug in the pam_stack autodetection part of the specfile. This can explain any authentication issues with dovecot on CentOS4 and 3 (5 is safe). There will be 1.0.1-1_58 very soon to fix this, thanks for spotting this! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpgFP9TyS2HP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
