On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 12:30:14PM -0400, Joe Klemmer wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: > > >>>Do you by any chance have atrpms enabled as a repo? > >> > >> As it happens, yes. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? > > > >A good thing definitely. :) > > > >What version of dovecot is now on your system? E.g. what's rpm -q > >dovecot saying? > > $ rpm -q dovecot > dovecot-1.0.1-1_57.el4 That's an ATrpms version (living in atrpms-testing). > I was thinking of dropping back to an earlier version to see if > that makes a difference. Personally I would recommend fixing the above, as the dovecot version as shipped by the upstream vendor (0.99.11 from 2004) is not maintained by the author anymore. See http://wiki.dovecot.org/UpgradingDovecot for details. If you were using the default config nothing really affects you, but since you have troubles there must be something changed. Also check with rpm -V dovecot whether the config files are changed and whether you have *.rpmnew files instead. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpGlR5p7q3WD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
