Re: Re: Anaconda doesn't support raid10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Ruslan Sivak wrote:

Thank you for the links. Looks like my controller doesn't support NCQ :-(. I have the SIL 3114 based card. Doesn't look like there are any cheap alternatives on the PCI bus, but I think I can live with the performance of this system.

Russ



Promise SATA300 TX4  ~ $60 @ newegg

Fresh install of centos 5 x85_64:

sata_promise 0000:01:0a.0: version 1.04
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APC2] enabled at IRQ 17
GSI 20 sharing vector 0x3A and IRQ 20
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:01:0a.0[A] -> Link [APC2] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 58 ata5: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFFFFC20000020200 ctl 0xFFFFC20000020238 bmdma 0x0 irq 58 ata6: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFFFFC20000020280 ctl 0xFFFFC200000202B8 bmdma 0x0 irq 58 ata7: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFFFFC20000020300 ctl 0xFFFFC20000020338 bmdma 0x0 irq 58 ata8: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFFFFC20000020380 ctl 0xFFFFC200000203B8 bmdma 0x0 irq 58
scsi4 : sata_promise
ata5: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
ata5.00: ATA-8, max UDMA7, 976773168 sectors: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32)
ata5.00: configured for UDMA/133
scsi5 : sata_promise
ata6: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
scsi6 : sata_promise
ata7: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
ata7.00: ATA-8, max UDMA7, 976773168 sectors: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32)
ata7.00: configured for UDMA/133
scsi7 : sata_promise
ata8: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)



--
Toby Bluhm
Midwest Instruments Inc.
30825 Aurora Road Suite 100
Solon Ohio 44139
440-424-2250


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux