Re: Re: Anaconda doesn't support raid10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]




SATA and SCSI/SAS should give comparable single work-load sequential
numbers, but most SCSI/SAS have better seek times so random IO will
be better on those. Also SCSI/SAS support tagged command queuing,
which allows multiple overlapping IOs so you will tend to see better
mixed workload performance compared to SATA (multi-user environment).

Having said that some of the new SATA models that support NCQ, the
SATA version of TCQ, and that use some of the same SCSI/SAS onboard
processing (Western Digital Raptors) can approach or equal SCSI/SAS
mixed load performance, but their price also approaches or equals
SCSI/SAS and their spindle speeds still do not top 10K so random
will not be as good.

Nope. SATA drives with NCQ support are in the same price range as non NCQ drives, if not the same price, which is by far less costly than SCSI/SAS drives. Also, due to the incredible packing to get 200GB-750GB of space onto the platter, the lower RPM is made up for especially at the higher densities.

A 73GB 15K RPM SCSI/SAS drive is in the same price range as a 750GB 7.5K RPM NCQ capable SATA drive. Ten times the density at half the speed. I reckon it would give the SCSI drive a run for its money in regard to random access times.

The SCSI drive:
Spindle Speed	15000 rpm
Average latency	2.0 msec
Random read seek time	3.50 msec
Random write seek time	4.0 msec

The SATA drive:
Spindle Speed	7200 rpm
Native Command Queuing	Y
Average latency	4.16 msec
Random read seek time	<8.5 msec
Random write seek time	<10.0 msec
Maximum interface transfer rate	300 Mbytes/sec

Without NCQ enabled, it will take twice as long as the scsi drive. With NCQ enabled, the game changes.

Compare to a 10K scsi drive:
Spindle Speed	10,000 rpm
Sustained data transfer rate	80 Mbytes/sec.
Average latency	3.0 msec
Random read seek time	4.9 msec
Random write seek time	5.4 msec
Maximum interface transfer rate	320 Mbytes/sec

NCQ SATA is almost a no-brainer.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux