interesting. I am not having that issue on my DG based system. One the
major tweaks is the naughtiness factor. I run mine here @300 and that
strikes a good balance. at another client i run it @250. yet another
client @340. This is in addition to all of the other tweaks. It may
not work for you but so far i have yet to find anything with the ability
tob e so readily custom tailored..<G>
John Summerfield wrote:
William Warren wrote:
the nice thing about DG is it's flexibility. You can whitelist your
pc and leave the others filtered..or setup your pc to be in a less
stringent group. I would re-evaluate the full power of DG..<G>
It seems I lacked clarity: my point is that the rules are too stringent
and restrict perfectly innocent browsing. Almost any longish document
will contain enough bad words to be blocked, especially if it contains
current teen-speak.
--
My "Foundation" verse:
Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and
every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt
condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their
righteousness is of me, saith the LORD.
-- carpe ductum -- "Grab the tape"
CDTT (Certified Duct Tape Technician)
Linux user #322099
Machines:
206822
256638
276825
http://counter.li.org/
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
