Re: [CentOS] Forum utility, facility?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 12:48, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
> > This mail is probably spam.  The original message has been attached
> > along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted
> > mail in future.  See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
> > 
> >   google with a search like this: > > "site:www.centos.org xxxxx xxxxx" >
> >   (where xxxxx are your search terms) [...] 
> > 
> > HOT_NASTY          (100.0 points)BODY: Possible porn - Hot, Nasty, Wild, Young
> 
> LOL. Johnny, you young, hot, nasty and wild CentOS developer. Do you
> strip your packages while they're fresh?
> 
> *snicker*

Oops -- that was added by my outbound relay because I'm posting
from home instead of a work machine where the scan would be
skippped.   And it will probably do it again on this one
because of those x's.  I bumped up the spamassassin score
to help keep things safe for work...

-- 
  Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx


This mail is probably spam.  The original message has been attached
along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted
mail in future.  See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.

Content preview:  On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 12:48, Ralph Angenendt wrote: >
  Les Mikesell wrote: > > This mail is probably spam. The original
  message has been attached > > along with this report, so you can
  recognize or block similar unwanted > > mail in future. See
  http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. > > > > google with a
  search like this: > > "site:www.centos.org xxxxx xxxxx" > > > (where
  xxxxx are your search terms) [...] > > > > HOT_NASTY (100.0
  points)BODY: Possible porn - Hot, Nasty, Wild, Young > > LOL. Johnny,
  you young, hot, nasty and wild CentOS developer. Do you > strip your
  packages while they're fresh? > > *snicker* [...] 

Content analysis details:   (94.60 points, 5 required)
IN_REP_TO          (-0.5 points) Has a In-Reply-To header
REFERENCES         (-0.5 points) Has a valid-looking References header
EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION  (-0.5 points) BODY: Contains what looks like an email attribution
HOT_NASTY          (100.0 points)BODY: Possible porn - Hot, Nasty, Wild, Young
QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT  (-0.5 points) BODY: Contains what looks like a quoted email text
REPLY_WITH_QUOTES  (-0.5 points) Reply with quoted text
USER_AGENT_XIMIAN  (-2.9 points) Headers indicate a non-spam MUA (Ximian)


X-FS-Spam-Score: ****************************************
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux