On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 04:07, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> You mean like this:
>
> http://www.centos.org/search.php
>
> or using google with a search like this:
>
> "site:www.centos.org xxxxx xxxxx"
> (where xxxxx are your search terms)
The problem with searching is that forums and mail lists
have a lot of noise. Even under the best circumstances it
usually takes several debugging steps and there are often
misleading conjectures before a solution is found. If
it is too difficult to manually extract the useful parts
to a wiki, maybe an approach like the slashdot ranking
scheme could be used to weight the search results so
messages someone else had marked as useful would float
to the top of the list.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached
along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted
mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
Content preview: On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 04:07, Johnny Hughes wrote: > You
mean like this: > > http://www.centos.org/search.php > > or using
google with a search like this: > > "site:www.centos.org xxxxx xxxxx" >
(where xxxxx are your search terms) [...]
Content analysis details: (95.10 points, 5 required)
IN_REP_TO (-0.5 points) Has a In-Reply-To header
REFERENCES (-0.5 points) Has a valid-looking References header
EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION (-0.5 points) BODY: Contains what looks like an email attribution
HOT_NASTY (100.0 points)BODY: Possible porn - Hot, Nasty, Wild, Young
REPLY_WITH_QUOTES (-0.5 points) Reply with quoted text
USER_AGENT_XIMIAN (-2.9 points) Headers indicate a non-spam MUA (Ximian)
X-FS-Spam-Score: ****************************************
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
