Alfred von Campe spake the following on 8/2/2006 3:06 PM: > On Aug 2, 2006, at 15:11, William L. Maltby wrote: > >> I'm new, but I think if you add it to a system, some changed things will >> appear on boot. Do a >> >> pvscan --verbose >> vgdisplay --verbose >> lvdisplay --verbose xxxx # for each volgroup >> >> to get a layout. I *suspect* the LVM routines have everything set up as >> far as the physical aspects go. But the normal VolGroup00/LogVol00 is >> already used on your machine. I'm not sure how LVM will place the new >> volume into the system. If lucky, just find the physical volume and >> makes new /dev/mapper entries. That would be good. I've not had to do >> this carrying a disk to another machine. > > I was able to mount the partition I needed, and accessing some > subdirectories was no problem at all. But others, including the top > level directory, would generate lots of errors. I was able to copy > (using scp) some critical files I needed. I'm still not convinced that > the disk suffered a HW failure (I'm running the a long SMART test now). > How can I determine if indeed the disk failed, as opposed to the file > system just getting corrupted? I've salvaged everything I need off of > this disk, so running fsck on it is not a problem. I would like to > determine the root cause, though. > > Alfred If filesystem is not needed, you could make a new filesystem on it with check for bad blocks enabled. I think it is mke2fs -cc /dev/sda (or whatever it is) for a deep read/write test. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos