On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 19:22 -0300, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote: > I agree :) > Please let's s/stability/volume of updates/g and start it all over > again :) The concept is still flawed if you pick some arbitrary time interval for the comparison since the distros that backport fixes into the released app versions will tend to tend to have less activity as the distro ages. That is, many problems may be found and fixed soon after release, but finding new ones will eventually taper off and as the developers move on to new versions there is less interest in fixing old ones. However, almost by definition, fedora uses a fast release cycle and lots of updates and Centos has much less churn - but not quite to the point of Debian stable where there is never even a schedule for the next version. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos