Re: [CentOS] Statistics on stability?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 19:22 -0300, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:

> I agree :)
> Please let's s/stability/volume of updates/g and start it all over
> again :)

The concept is still flawed if you pick some arbitrary time interval
for the comparison since the distros that backport fixes into the
released app versions will tend to tend to have less activity as
the distro ages.  That is, many problems may be found and fixed soon
after release, but finding new ones will eventually taper off and
as the developers move on to new versions there is less interest in
fixing old ones.

However, almost by definition, fedora uses a fast release cycle and
lots of updates and Centos has much less churn - but not quite to the
point of Debian stable where there is never even a schedule for the
next version.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux