Am 26.07.23 um 00:52 schrieb Gordon Messmer:
On 2023-07-25 12:18, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer@xxxxxxxxx> said:
If Red Hat were doing development in RHEL minor releases that wasn't
published elsewhere, I would probably have a different view of
thing, but they aren't. There's nothing there that isn't published
elsewhere.
This will not be the case for the second half of a RHEL major release
life cycle, because the corresponding Stream will be EOL and no longer
updated.
As best I understand Red Hat's "upstream first" policy: every patch
applied to RHEL X.10 will either be a patch that they import from an
upstream project, or (for patches that Red Hat develops) will be offered
to the upstream project. They're not held in reserve for RHEL customers
exclusively.
So, they may not appear in the Stream git repo, but the patches are
still publicly available through other channels.
If anyone has examples of this not happening, then we can talk about
whether the process is working as intended, and what that means.
Honestly, you are mixing unrelated, or not relevant topics and
arguments, and even misconceptions and forget to understand the
problem at all. When done intentionally, its just a flashbang approach
and this doesn't contribute to clarify the actual new reality.
--
Leon
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
