you think you can fund something like that with a bake sale or so?,
maintaining a separate distro for the same thing is VERY expensive
On 4/28/21 2:08 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 28/4/2021 10:35 π.μ., Nikolaos Milas wrote:
All that, in turn, are very much dependent on community involvement
and project management & financing.
By the way, I think that CentOS, before it was "absorbed" by Redhat,
could/might have addressed the community for fund raising, rather than
abandoning the project to RH, which, as others have mentioned, was an
unmistakable sign of upcoming CentOS EOL as we had come to know it.
If the financing need was communicated correctly, I am very confident
that financing would have been secured, e.g. by using a public fund
raising platform, due to CentOS huge install base and community.
Any of those current (or future) projects that might prove successful
enough to become CentOS successor (as a RHEL binary twin, and not as
Stream), should use the community financing model, in order to avoid
CentOS fate.
My 0.01$ :)
Nick
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
