Am 10.12.20 um 07:09 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs:
Le 10/12/2020 à 00:51, Joshua Kramer a écrit :
There have been hundreds of other messages that describe exactly what
RedHat loses in this deal so I won't go into that here. But branding
oneself as a "bad faith actor" is usually a terrible way to try to
pick up a little bit of subscription revenue. In the end it's going
to be a losing scenario. This is an absolutely UNMITIGATED DISASTER
from a marketing and community goodwill standpoint.
Reactions from competent sources all over the world are downright negative.
https://linuxfr.org/news/centos-se-saborde-t-elle
https://kofler.info/nachruf-auf-centos/
And this petition launched a bit more than a day ago already counts 3500
signatures (and growing fast):
https://www.change.org/p/centos-governing-board-do-not-destroy-centos-by-using-it-as-a-rhel-upstream
If I was a CentOS developer or a Red Hat employee, a mere glance at the
comments would inform me that I've just made a disastrous decision. Even if
there *may* be *some* technical merits to it.
It must be a strong management when they roll back. Hope is the last one
that die ...
--
Leon
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
