Le 10/12/2020 à 00:51, Joshua Kramer a écrit :
> There have been hundreds of other messages that describe exactly what
> RedHat loses in this deal so I won't go into that here. But branding
> oneself as a "bad faith actor" is usually a terrible way to try to
> pick up a little bit of subscription revenue. In the end it's going
> to be a losing scenario. This is an absolutely UNMITIGATED DISASTER
> from a marketing and community goodwill standpoint.
Reactions from competent sources all over the world are downright negative.
https://linuxfr.org/news/centos-se-saborde-t-elle
https://kofler.info/nachruf-auf-centos/
And this petition launched a bit more than a day ago already counts 3500
signatures (and growing fast):
https://www.change.org/p/centos-governing-board-do-not-destroy-centos-by-using-it-as-a-rhel-upstream
If I was a CentOS developer or a Red Hat employee, a mere glance at the
comments would inform me that I've just made a disastrous decision. Even if
there *may* be *some* technical merits to it.
Cheers,
Niki
--
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr
Mail : info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
Mob. : 06 51 80 12 12
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
