Re: How insecure is NIS ? Possible alternatives ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Le 26/03/2018 à 10:28, isdtor a écrit :
> In my opionion, there is a serious gap in this area. It's either NIS,
> simple, easy to setup yet insecure, or LDAP/FreeIPA/RH Id management
> server at a complexity at least one order of magnitude beyond NIS.

I gave FreeIPA a spin a while back. I installed it on a sandbox server,
and from what I recall, it pulled in a tsunami of dependencies, and
first thing it wanted to replace my Dnsmasq with BIND... so I didn't
look much further.

-- 
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr
Mail : info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux