Le 26/03/2018 à 10:28, isdtor a écrit : > There's also the option of using AD if such infrastructure exists. There are no Windows clients in the network, only CentOS 7. -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr Mail : info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32 _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: How insecure is NIS ? Possible alternatives ?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: How insecure is NIS ? Possible alternatives ?
- From: Nicolas Kovacs <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:43:10 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20180326082848.GA50403@localhost.localdomain>
- Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
- References: <4b83d3cb-1452-eb5b-2d78-bd060237e869@microlinux.fr> <20180326082848.GA50403@localhost.localdomain>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
- References:
- How insecure is NIS ? Possible alternatives ?
- From: Nicolas Kovacs
- Re: How insecure is NIS ? Possible alternatives ?
- From: isdtor
- How insecure is NIS ? Possible alternatives ?
- Prev by Date: Re: How insecure is NIS ? Possible alternatives ?
- Next by Date: Re: How insecure is NIS ? Possible alternatives ?
- Previous by thread: Re: How insecure is NIS ? Possible alternatives ?
- Next by thread: Re: How insecure is NIS ? Possible alternatives ?
- Index(es):
 |