The problem is that I don't get "defensive" until people psycho-analyze
me directly.
Take for example this latest post ...
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2005-September/012024.html
"This list is completely useless if you're going to be attacked
constantly by the likes of Bryan without anyone else stepping in
and putting a stop to it."
One quick trip to the CentOS archives will show that Mr. Preston entered
not 1 but *2* prior threadds just to criticize me. How non-objective
can he be? But when I do it, it's an "attack."
"I apologize and I admit it was wrong to continue an OT post here.
But I was just trying to defend myself."
Ahhh, that age-old excuse. Not even *I* claim "I'm just defending
myself." I take full ownership of what I do. But apparently I piss off
almost everyone in a room according to Mr. Preston.
Unobjective hypocrisy. I'm honest and take ownership. Select others
aren't honest and man they never take ownership without a "but ...".
--
Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx http://thebs413.blogspot.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The best things in life are NOT free - which is why life is easiest if
you save all the bills until you can share them with the perfect woman
