Sorry, that was meant for Dan Trainor only.
[ FYI, I have formally asked that my posts be blocked from reaching the
list. That will solve any chance like this. ]
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 17:20 -0500, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> The problem is that I don't get "defensive" until people psycho-analyze
> me directly.
>
> Take for example this latest post ...
>
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2005-September/012024.html
>
> "This list is completely useless if you're going to be attacked
> constantly by the likes of Bryan without anyone else stepping in
> and putting a stop to it."
>
> One quick trip to the CentOS archives will show that Mr. Preston entered
> not 1 but *2* prior threadds just to criticize me. How non-objective
> can he be? But when I do it, it's an "attack."
>
> "I apologize and I admit it was wrong to continue an OT post here.
> But I was just trying to defend myself."
>
> Ahhh, that age-old excuse. Not even *I* claim "I'm just defending
> myself." I take full ownership of what I do. But apparently I piss off
> almost everyone in a room according to Mr. Preston.
>
> Unobjective hypocrisy. I'm honest and take ownership. Select others
> aren't honest and man they never take ownership without a "but ...".
>
>
--
Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx http://thebs413.blogspot.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The best things in life are NOT free - which is why life is easiest if
you save all the bills until you can share them with the perfect woman
