Re: routing with 2 public ips

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hello,

i follow your discussion. The first 2 posts using multiple default routes solve my problem perfect.

Thank you all.

J


Am 2015-12-30 17:21, schrieb Eliezer Croitoru:
On 30/12/2015 10:22, Paul R. Ganci wrote:

On 12/30/2015 12:44 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
"I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default
gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the
incoming device "

I'm sorry but I have been following this thread for a while and
everything that Gordon (and I mentioned in my first post) is accurate.
This is a routing problem not a NATing problem. Even if it can be
handled via NATing (which I serious doubt) it would require ridiculous
server resources which are not necessary. Please look at our links
carefully, This problem is simply handled by proper routing rules.
Whether those are implemented via my suggested generic linux rules or
via the Redhat specific rules Gordon suggested that is the proper way to
handle the problem. I too am puzzled by what you are trying to do here
otherwise.

And just for the record I have a server with two interfaces on the same
broadcast network and did exactly what I showed in the link I sent and
got exactly what I wanted. From this single sentence you seem to want to
do what either Gordon or I suggested in the links we sent. Why do you
insist on playing with iptables when that is not the proper tool for
this job?

I do not insist on anything else then there are missing things in the
picture... it is that simple nothing more then that.
If the thread poster will bother to clear the picture then I will be
able to understand.
I do not want anything and I do not need anything for me, my servers
and routing works just great but the thread started by someone which
is not here anymore so if everything works for me and if everything
works for you and Gordon I really do not think any more time or words
should be invested in something that is unclear at-least to me.

Eliezer
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux