John R Pierce wrote: > On 12/22/2015 1:27 PM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> I beg your pardon. What*possible* reason is there for a server, >> hardwired, to "announce" itself to anything, other than DHCP? Everywhere >> I've worked, and what I know, is that servers are assigned IP addresses, >> they don't just take whatever's offered, willy-nilly. And if they do... >> I do*not* want to work there. That's not only unprofessional, it's an >> insane security risk. Suppose someone puts their laptop on the intranet, >> and has*it* running a DHCP server? > > You do know there's more to life than static IP webapp servers, right? You mean, like dhcp-served IP addresses that are tied to MAC addresses for compute nodes, and heavy-duty research servers? No, really? <snip> > My development lab environment, most of my servers (75% VMs) are DHCP > configured (using static and/or long lease time reservations), which > makes doing PXE and such much easier. A foreign DHCP server would > quickly be detected by the corporate IDS and cut off the network. > Sorry, I believe I've mentioned here, before, that we only have a couple-three VMs... we run the o/s on bare metal, because we need every cycle. Though I will admit that the system that I had to power cycle this morning, where one of my user's week-long job had toasted, top showing a load of (I'm not making this up) 286, and no response on the console, is an extreme case. Normal for some of these week and two week-long jobs is 30-75.... mark _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos