Re: Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts

[Always Learning <centos@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 12:32 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Joerg Schilling
> <Joerg.Schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Now you just need to understand what "as a whole" means....


> Yes, in english, 'work as a whole' does mean complete.  And the normal
> interpretation is that it covers everything linked into the same
> process at runtime unless there is an alternate interface-compatible
> component with the same feature set.

That may be the USA interpretation but on the other, European, side of
the Atlantic I believe

	"as a whole" means generally BUT allowing for exceptions.


-- 
Regards,

Paul.
England, EU.      Je suis Charlie.


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos